Lesheng Self-Saving Association went to the government to protest and clash with police (1) Photo Credit: WebMD Since the legal interests it seeks to protect cannot be found, it means that the actions of criticizing the Office are not socially invasive, and they are not qualified to commit crimes at all. In legal hermeneutics, they lack "Strafwurdigkeit" from the beginning, that is, they can't find it at all. Justified reasons to protect legal interests. Such legislation is obviously unconstitutional and should not exist at all.
If you still insist on criminalizing such an color correction services unpunishable behavior, you are willfully infringing on the basic rights of the people and blatantly trampling on the value of the Constitution. So far, the one who insulted the Office was none other than the Office itself. The existence of the state has never been to be looked up to. There must be criticism and supervision, so that the state will not quickly corrupt because of its fearlessness. This is the most basic common sense in the practice of democracy. If we are still using the "Criminal Law" to establish authoritarianism to intimidate the people, this is not only a blatant violation of the basic rights of the people, but also a mockery of the so-called "liberal democratic constitutional order".
Because the suppression of freedom of speech not only destroys the right to freedom, but also undermines democratic thinking, and it also regards the value of constitutional order as nothing. We should stand up bravely, show solidarity with all those who are being hunted down by the authoritarian Criminal Law, and jointly urge the progress of decriminalization. This is not only our right as citizens, but also our obligation to safeguard our democratic homeland. Note: The Legislative Yuan's Proposal Relationship Document, General No.